In a startling turn of events, the alleged killers of Khalistan extremist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, whose death set off international tremors, are reportedly walking free. Despite facing serious charges, these individuals have been released under a “stay of proceedings,” a decision that raises pressing questions about Canada’s commitment to justice and accountability.
Apparently all four of Hardeep Singh Nijjar killers are no longer in custody. pic.twitter.com/uY0wYPp7Ta
— Brattani (@Bratt_world) January 8, 2025
Hardeep Singh Nijjar’s killing has been a lightning rod for controversy. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in an unprecedented move, publicly blamed India for Nijjar’s death without presenting substantive evidence. This inflammatory accusation strained diplomatic ties and became a significant factor in Trudeau’s recent political downfall. Yet, as Trudeau stepped down amid dwindling credibility, Canada’s handling of the accused killers seems to exemplify a deeper systemic issue—its overly lenient criminal justice system.
The release of Nijjar’s alleged killers, pending a Supreme Court trial likely to begin next month, comes after months of delays in their judicial process. Four JIR (judicial interim release) hearings were repeatedly postponed, and the case is now shrouded under a publication ban during pre-trial conferences. While such measures might aim to ensure fair proceedings, the message sent to the public is troubling: individuals accused of grave crimes can resume their lives in society while justice remains elusive.
You can see the SOP here.
— Brattani (@Bratt_world) January 8, 2025
Their four JIR hearings were delayed over and over and now they are going to pic.twitter.com/HIHKxmWdJE
What’s more disconcerting is the underlying pattern. This is not an isolated instance of leniency. Canada’s soft stance on crime has long been criticized for prioritizing the rights of the accused over the rights of victims and the safety of the public. Releasing individuals accused of such severe crimes undermines public trust in the system and leaves victims’ families without closure.
Accountability in governance and justice should never take a backseat to procedural formalities. While due process is essential, it must not become a shield for those accused of heinous acts to escape the weight of their actions. A robust justice system balances fairness with firmness, ensuring that public safety and trust are upheld.
Canada’s judiciary now faces a critical juncture. The Supreme Court trial next month will be closely watched—not just by Canadians, but by the global community. The outcome will serve as a litmus test for whether the nation can uphold the principles of justice in the face of political and social complexities.
It is time for Canada to reevaluate its stance on crime and prioritize accountability over leniency. The world is watching, and justice must not only be done but also seen to be done. The stakes go beyond this one case; they touch the very foundation of public faith in democratic institutions.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of Khalsa Vox or its members.
