The intertwining of art, identity, and politics often creates a tangled web that transcends borders. In recent years, some artists—particularly in the Punjabi music scene—have been accused of aligning with Khalistani extremism, either vocally or implicitly. Among these figures, Canadian singer Jazzy B stands out as one of the vocal proponents, advocating for the secession of Punjab from India under the Khalistan banner.
His views have not been without consequence. The Indian government previously blocked Jazzy B’s Twitter account following legal demands, signaling the state’s strong stance against content promoting separatism. Yet just recently, Jazzy B performed in Delhi, sparking a firestorm of questions. Why was he granted a visa? Why wasn’t his return to Indian soil met with stricter scrutiny? And why do artists who espouse anti-India rhetoric continue to reap financial and cultural rewards within the very country they vilify?
The Nexus of Popularity and Extremism
Punjabi music, fueled by a powerful diaspora, enjoys widespread influence both domestically and internationally. From the fields of Punjab to global arenas in Canada, the United States, and the UK, Punjabi singers have cultivated massive followings. Jazzy B, like others, has built his brand on a combination of nostalgia, cultural pride, and populist messaging. But what happens when that cultural pride bleeds into separatist propaganda?
Rapper Jazzy B openly admitting to wanting a Khalistan and justifying by saying Sikhs have no place or history in India. pic.twitter.com/Ht4qLaupbJ
— धैर्यम (@IntelWasabi) February 5, 2021
Artists who flirt with Khalistani narratives often garner heightened attention—especially within sections of the diaspora that remain sympathetic to the movement. For them, associating with the Khalistani cause is not just about politics; it’s about cultural signaling. By invoking historical grievances, artists appeal to deep-rooted emotions tied to Punjab’s complex past, positioning themselves as champions of a cause, even as the cause itself remains divisive. This popularity can translate into larger audiences, sold-out concerts, and increased streaming revenue.
Concert Backing and Financial Incentives
Behind the scenes, allegations of funding from Khalistani groups further complicate the narrative. Overseas pro-Khalistan organizations have historically provided financial backing for events, particularly in countries like Canada and the UK, where separatist sentiments find fertile ground. For artists, aligning with such groups can mean access to better concert venues, higher paychecks, and international exposure.
Khalistani singer Shubh glorified Indira Gandhi's killers in London by wearing hoodie with pic and date of her assassination on the map of Punjab.
— BALA (@erbmjha) October 31, 2023
Earlier, when he posted distorted map of Bharat, Congress and the leftist ecosystem defended him tooth and nail. pic.twitter.com/phiufU5c9y
This raises critical ethical concerns: Are these singers exploiting a movement for personal gain under the guise of “freedom of speech”? Or are they genuine believers in separatism, using their art as a platform to promote their agenda? Either way, the result is a troubling cycle where art, extremism, and money feed into one another.
A Responsibility Beyond Borders
Artists hold a powerful position in society. They can amplify voices, heal divides, or—conversely—exploit them. For artists like Jazzy B, aligning with a fringe ideology may appear advantageous in the short term. However, it erodes the collective fabric of a community that thrives on inclusivity, shared history, and progress.
As fans, we must ask ourselves: Are we celebrating art, or are we enabling divisiveness? For governments, the task is clearer. Artists who propagate extremism under the pretense of cultural advocacy must be held accountable—both domestically and abroad. Granting platforms to those who openly oppose national unity is not a show of strength; it is an invitation for exploitation.
It’s time to recognize the fine line between art and opportunism and draw it boldly.
